<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01412nam a22001937a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">D0001C000048</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">DOH</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20201120141918.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">201120b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Quesnel, Louis B. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">The efficiency of surgical masks of varying design and composition /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Louis B. Quesnel</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Five different types of surgical mask of varying design and composition of natural and synthetic fibres were tested for their efficiency in vivo by means of a special test chamber. Contaminated particles escaping through or around the mask during speech by the wearer could be collected and sized. Analysis of the data showed that the gross efficiency of all the masks was high, but that some masks were distinctly better at small particle 'filtration' than others. There was a significant difference in efficiency between the best and worst masks. The best masks contained more fabric, were softer and were pleated, while the worst were stiffer, smaller and not pleated. Reusable cotton fabric masks were as effective as synthetic fabric masks when made to a good design.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="580" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In: British Journal of Surgery 1975 vol. 62 (12) pages: 936&#x2013;940.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Air Microbiology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Bacteria</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">isolation and purification</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Masks</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">standards</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7161878/pdf/BJS-62-936.pdf</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CV</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">1782</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">1782</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">ElectronicRes</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2020-11-20</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">COVID-19-000048</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">D0001C000048</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2020-11-20 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2020-11-20</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">CV</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
