<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02667nam a22002297a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">D0001J000078</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">DOH</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210219133816.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210219b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Comparison of the hybrid locking plate, standard dynamic compression plate, and standard dynamic compression plate augmented with bone cement for fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures : </subfield>
    <subfield code="b">a cadaveric biomechanical study /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Irewin A. Tabu [and two others]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BACKGROUND: Studies comparing the relative strength of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmented fixation, standard plating and locked compression plate (LCP) system are few. The use of either the bone cement-augmented dynamic compression plate or the Hybrid LCP constructs may provide an additional tool for the treatment of fractures in patients with osteoporosis.


METHODS: Eighteen (18) osteoporotic cadaveric humeral bones were assigned randomly to each of three groups (Dynamic Compression Plate [DCP], DCP augmented with bone cement, and the Hybrid LCP system) and tested in anterior-posterior bending and torsion/external rotation. The load to failure values were obtained and the results for each specimen compared.


RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the standard DCP and Hybrid LCP group (p-value=0.012), and in the cement-augmented and Hybrid LCP group (p-value=0.099) in torsion/external rotation loading. No significant difference was observed between the standard DCP and bone-cement augmented group (p-value=0.248). No significant difference was observed among the three groups in terms of stiffness (p-value=0.3868) in the four-point anterior-posterior bending modality. Screw pull-out of the implant was observed only in the regular DCP group in torsion/external rotation loading stress.


CONCLUSION: Significant differences were seen between the three constructs in torsion/external rotation but not in anterior-posterior four-point bending. Bone failure, but not screw pull-out, was seen in the Hybrid LCP and bone cement-augmented DCP groups in torsion. This study showed that the LCP system and the bone cement-augmented constructs may provide greater screw purchase to the osteoporotic humerus.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="580" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In: Acta Medica Philippina, 2012 vol 46 (2) pages: 24-31</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Humeral Fractures</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Osteoporosis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Polymethyl Methacrylate</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Fractures, Compression</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Tabu, Irewin A. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Arbatin,  Jose Joefrey F. </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Jr. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bundoc, Rafael C. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://actamedicaphilippina.upm.edu.ph/index.php/acta/article/view/2155/1570</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2986</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2986</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">nlm</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">ElectronicRes</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2021-02-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">J000078</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">D0001J000078</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2021-02-19 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2021-02-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
