<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Comparison of the hybrid locking plate, standard dynamic compression plate, and standard dynamic compression plate augmented with bone cement for fixation of osteoporotic humeral shaft fractures</title>
    <subTitle>a cadaveric biomechanical study</subTitle>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Tabu, Irewin A.</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Arbatin,  Jose Joefrey F.</namePart>
    <namePart type="termsOfAddress">Jr</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Bundoc, Rafael C.</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>BACKGROUND: Studies comparing the relative strength of polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmented fixation, standard plating and locked compression plate (LCP) system are few. The use of either the bone cement-augmented dynamic compression plate or the Hybrid LCP constructs may provide an additional tool for the treatment of fractures in patients with osteoporosis.


METHODS: Eighteen (18) osteoporotic cadaveric humeral bones were assigned randomly to each of three groups (Dynamic Compression Plate [DCP], DCP augmented with bone cement, and the Hybrid LCP system) and tested in anterior-posterior bending and torsion/external rotation. The load to failure values were obtained and the results for each specimen compared.


RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between the standard DCP and Hybrid LCP group (p-value=0.012), and in the cement-augmented and Hybrid LCP group (p-value=0.099) in torsion/external rotation loading. No significant difference was observed between the standard DCP and bone-cement augmented group (p-value=0.248). No significant difference was observed among the three groups in terms of stiffness (p-value=0.3868) in the four-point anterior-posterior bending modality. Screw pull-out of the implant was observed only in the regular DCP group in torsion/external rotation loading stress.


CONCLUSION: Significant differences were seen between the three constructs in torsion/external rotation but not in anterior-posterior four-point bending. Bone failure, but not screw pull-out, was seen in the Hybrid LCP and bone cement-augmented DCP groups in torsion. This study showed that the LCP system and the bone cement-augmented constructs may provide greater screw purchase to the osteoporotic humerus.</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">Irewin A. Tabu [and two others]</note>
  <note>In: Acta Medica Philippina, 2012 vol 46 (2) pages: 24-31</note>
  <subject authority="mesh">
    <topic>Humeral Fractures</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="mesh">
    <topic>Osteoporosis</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="mesh">
    <topic>Polymethyl Methacrylate</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="mesh">
    <topic>Fractures, Compression</topic>
  </subject>
  <identifier type="uri">https://actamedicaphilippina.upm.edu.ph/index.php/acta/article/view/2155/1570</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>https://actamedicaphilippina.upm.edu.ph/index.php/acta/article/view/2155/1570</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">210219</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20210219133816.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="DOH">D0001J000078</recordIdentifier>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
