<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01644nam a22001817a 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">D0001J000184</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">DOH</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20210317132349.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210317b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ang, Mary Jocelyn </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">A comparison of epidural infusion with regular intermittent injection of bupivacaine 0.125% in primigravids and multigravids in labor at the Philippine General Hospital :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">a pilot study /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Mary Jocelyn Ang</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Twenty women in labor were located to receive either a continuous epidural infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at a rate 8-10 ml/hr or hourly intermittent injections of bupivacaine 0.125%. Both groups received an initial bolus dose of 8-10 ml bupivacaine 0.125% . Supplementary top-up doses of 4-5 ml bupivacaine 0.15% were given when the pain scores failed to change in the subsequent hour. Results showed that both groups attained comparable best pain scores (p&gt;0.37), but more patients from the intermittent injection group suffered worst pain scores(p=0.0704). The infusion group has a significantly shortened active stage of labor (p&lt;0.1) and used less total volume of bupivacaine 0.125%(p&lt;0.001). Sixty percent of the intermittent injection group required top-up doses. Likewise, there was a greater incidence of motor block in this group (p=0.016). Instrumental delivery was not needed for both groups. 2/10*20%) belonging to the intermittent injection group reported pain on episiotomy, episiorrhaphy and delivery.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="580" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Acta Medica Philippina,1993  29 ( 4 ) pages 184-196</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Analgesia, Epidural</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Bupivacaine</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Gravidity</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">3586</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">3586</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">nlm</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">DOHCL</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">ElectronicRes</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2021-03-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">J000184</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">D0001J000184</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2021-03-17 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2021-03-17</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
