<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Vitamin C labelling of selected commercially processed and packaged juice drinks</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Lontoc, A.V.</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Reyes, G.D.</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Matibag, P.M.</namePart>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Aguinaldo, A.R.</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>The vitamin C labelling in selected local juice drinks was evaluated by comparison of samples collected in 1983 and 1989; validity of label claims; product differences; and contributions to the RDA of 10-12 years old children. In 1983, 19 out of 27 products (70%) analyzed for vitamin C content, claimed vitamin C in their labels, either qualitatively (added/enriched/fortified) or quantitatively (9-60 mg/100 g). Actual assays showed contents ranging from less than 0.5 mg/100 g (or traces) to 58 mg/100 g. In 1989, 12 out of 15 products (80%) likewise made vitamin C claims with actual assays revealing levels from traces to 53 mg/100 g. Interestingly, the product with the highest values in both 1983 and 1989; which was packed in plastic bottle, did not bear any vitamin C claim. A comparison of the 1983 and 1989 figures, using 8 products existing in 1983 which were perceived to be popular in 1989, showed that the 1983 vitamin C analyses did not differ significantly from their 1989 assays. The 1989 label claims were validated in 3 tetra brik-packed and 1 foil laminate-packed juice drinks, out of 6 products bearing quantified claims. In contrast, the label claims of the 2 other products, all foil laminate-packed, were found to be 70-99% overstated based on actual assays, indicating either deliberate mislabelling or vitamin C loss related to packaging and storage. These mislabelled products were already existing in 1983, suggesting a lack of attempts at vitamin C monitoring and improvement during the intervening 6 years. The increasing use of vitamin C labelling in juice drinks to gain competitive advantage and the apparent unregulated mislabelling in these products call for, not only a product vitamin C assurance program among juice drinks producers but also a surveillance system by government and consumers alike. (Author)</abstract>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">A.V. Lontoc [and three others]</note>
  <note>
J Nutr-Diet Assoc Philipp, 1989 3 ( 4) pages  135-141</note>
  <subject authority="mesh">
    <topic>Product Labeling</topic>
  </subject>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">210430</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20210430110531.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
