<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02237nam a22003017a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">686</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">686</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="001">D0001E000029</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">DOH</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20200806155502.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">200521b        ph ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">DOH</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">DOH</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="0" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Correlates of gonococcal infection and of antimicrobial-resistant neisseria gonorrhoeae among females sex workers, Republic of the Philippines /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">Jeffrey D. Klausner [and five others]</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">From 1994 to 1997, the proportion of Neisseria gonorrhoeae highly resistant to ciprofloxacin (MIC &gt;/=4 microg/mL) increased substantially among female sex workers (FSWs) in the Philippines. Among 1499 Filipina FSWs, we evaluated factors associated with gonococcal infection and with gonococcal antimicrobial resistance. By multivariate analysis, gonococcal infection was associated with sex with a new client, self-prescribed prophylactic antimicrobial use, work in a brothel, and inconsistent condom use and was negatively associated with registration status and vaginal hygiene practices. Factors associated with ciprofloxacin-resistant gonococci included: marital status, living alone, duration of sex work, and clinic site. Further, gonococci highly resistant to ciprofloxacin were isolated from 10 (11.5%) of 87 FSWs reporting self-prescribed antimicrobial use versus 44 (3.4%) of 1295 reporting no antimicrobial use (P&lt;.001). Self-prescribed prophylactic antimicrobial use and inconsistent condom use could be important factors in the continued emergence of gonococcal antimicrobial resistance in the Philippines.</subfield>
    <subfield code="u">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9952388/</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="580" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In: Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1999 Vol. 179 (3) pages 729-33</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Anti-Infective Agents</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">pharmacology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Anti-Infective Agents</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">therapeutic use</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Ciprofloxacin</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">pharmacology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Gonorrhea</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">drug therapy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Sexually Transmitted Diseases</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">epidemiology</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="653" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sex Workers</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Klausner, Jeffrey D. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Aplasca, Mari-Rose </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mesola, Virginia P. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Bolan, Gail</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Whittington, W. L. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Holmes, King K. </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/179/3/729/809506</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">JA</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
